<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britannica, Wikipedia and General Reference</title>
	<link>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog, from the EBlogger.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 10:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: eblogger</title>
		<link>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/#comment-51</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:39:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/#comment-51</guid>
					<description>sj, I think a dialog about the pros and cons of collaborative versus &quot;traditional&quot; production processes would be good for both Wikipedia and Britannica.  Indeed, that's part of what I'm trying to do here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>sj, I think a dialog about the pros and cons of collaborative versus &#8220;traditional&#8221; production processes would be good for both Wikipedia and Britannica.  Indeed, that&#8217;s part of what I&#8217;m trying to do here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sj</title>
		<link>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/#comment-45</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:49:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/#comment-45</guid>
					<description>Three cheers for this initiative!  Perhaps we can find a way to craft a similar set of observations from the symmetric point of view.  Not trivial, since few active Wikipedians know about the intricacies of Britannica, whereas the world can all gasp (or marvel) at WP's production line... but perhaps still doable.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Three cheers for this initiative!  Perhaps we can find a way to craft a similar set of observations from the symmetric point of view.  Not trivial, since few active Wikipedians know about the intricacies of Britannica, whereas the world can all gasp (or marvel) at WP&#8217;s production line&#8230; but perhaps still doable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Work in Progress</title>
		<link>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/#comment-33</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:07:33 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Elephant&lt;/strong&gt;

	Der Eblogger hat heute in einem Posting angekündigt, auf &amp;#8220;misconceptions&amp;#8221; in einer Serie eingehen zu wollen, die zwischen Wikipedia, Britannica und der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit herrschen. Ich freue mich auf diese Postings und werde sie...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Elephant</strong></p>
	<p>	Der Eblogger hat heute in einem Posting angekündigt, auf &#8220;misconceptions&#8221; in einer Serie eingehen zu wollen, die zwischen Wikipedia, Britannica und der allgemeinen Öffentlichkeit herrschen. Ich freue mich auf diese Postings und werde sie&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mahtias Schindler</title>
		<link>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/#comment-32</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:53:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://eblogger.blogsome.com/2005/10/05/eb-and-wp-and-general-reference/#comment-32</guid>
					<description>Hey, this sounds interesting.I am really looking forward to a) see your blog posts on these issues and b) discover ways to fix them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey, this sounds interesting.I am really looking forward to a) see your blog posts on these issues and b) discover ways to fix them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
